My theory of Light
Early life of questioning
It all begins with a five year old asking “why”. He goes on and on and on. You know the sort if ever you have had a young inquisitive child. They never know when to stop. The frustrated mother of mine eventually accuses me of being a doubting Thomas.
My search for the point of life had begun.
As I grew older I read stories of the carpenters son ( I was one of them) who asked questions and searched for answers to some thought provoking questions. That was me, my mother always said I had a probing mind. I tried to read myself but we only had a few books. One was the “Golden wonder book” It was a compendium with lots of stories, Greek fables of Theseus and the minotaur, Treasure Island, Robinson Crusoe etc they were a good basis to learn from thought my mother.
She used to encourage me to read but on the other hand if I were to write she would tell me how to do it right handed, if she used her left hand she was hit with a ruler she often reminded me. This became like a psychological torture. I only discovered the sources of this compulsion later in life. It probably led at the time to me being more timid around education than I should have been.
One winter after an allergic reaction to penicillin I was out of school for so long that in order to catch up and stand a better chance in taking the 11 plus I was sent to a tutor. She observed I was stuttering, shy, lacking in educational confidence and needing some specialist maths teaching. It was clear from then that everyone could sense I was very intelligent.
This was also evidenced in an incident with a bus. The old type of bus, with a conductor and a platform at the back. Well my friends and I would jump on and off the back while the driver and conductor sat together at the font of the bus having a break. This one time the conductor caught hold of me. Unbeknown to me he intended to drop me off at the next stop. However I wriggled free and jumped off the moving bus. I landed on the grass verge and must have banged my head. The next thing I recall was waking up in the armchair in the front room. The conductor (blondie we used to call him) was there concerned for my welfare with my mother telling me off, both at the same time. Not many of his passengers jumped off a moving bus.
This plus numerous other scrapes I got into involving falling through roofs, splitting my nose with a cycle lamp, falling out of the bathroom window all involving what we now know as head traumas and led to me being sent to a specialist hospital in Exeter. There I had a cap put over my skull with electrodes which measure my brain activity. This was when they thought I was very advanced for my age and probably very intelligent.
This discovery was a mixed blessing. My mother obviously very proud probably let it be known. Then the kids found out and called me big head. This was my first insight into the world of jealousy and bullying. The problem for the bullies was double fold. The first was I had something to be big headed about as I would retort. That was such a good retort there was no further point after that comeback. The second was I was very strong and determined not to be beaten. The fights I got into were numerous.
In order to get to sleep my mother taught me a trick her elder brother taught her. Holding and controlling your breath. This could allow me to fill my chest with air, hold it there for a considerable time relative to my piers and use this together with my long arms to bear hug any opponent. The grip was too much for most and I became someone they wanted to pick fights with by virtue of my superior strength. So again ever the resourceful I developed an ability to twist someone’s arm around their back. This constant fighting led to me being sent to judo lessons to develop a sense of discipline over my actions and that fighting is futile as it only generates more fighting.
Still I asked questions about everything to do with religion. We never went to church as mother and father could not believe in a god after a war which both of them lived through. Both of my granddads also lived through their wars but one had severe shellshock the other severe frostbite. Their experiences led me to dislike the idea of armed conflict.
I did like to sing at the school assemblies and it still echoes in my mind those classic hymns we sung, Jerusalem always got the whole school together and Praise him was a very thought provoking hymn. This was my first experience of whole groups of people joining together and creating a peaceful atmosphere. This I experienced all through my later life, at Christmas mass and other functions in any church especially.
I left school to become an electrician which involved learning about atoms. I questioned why there was nothing between them, a vacuum was the vague answer, which when coupled with “nature abhors a vacuum” made no sense to me then or now. Those thoughts lived with me for a very long time.
I also met a religious young lady whom I married despite having problems with the fact I was not christened as she. This began to crystallise my mothers view that the church was full of hypocritical people. So I lost respect for all but the very devoted. As my grandparents also endured the two wars it was a view backed up by the total stupidity of those times.
When I discovered that not all Christians were the same I grew a lot of respect for the Jehovah’s witnesses (JW’s). It seemed they did not believe in war yet were not cowards as they volunteered as stretcher bearers and the like. The one confusing thing was their outdated view of science. Given that blood donning was something I did to save my fellow man I was confused by their views. Then it became clear that this was born of misinterpreting the words “thou shalt not take blood” written somewhere in the bible. Well every one can interpret anything any way they like I concluded.
After my career as an electrician, a draughtsman and then a computer programmer, I then retrained to become a teacher. “you have a good stare” one of my lecturers at university said. This was just because I was furious with the question he had put to us. Later as I put into practice what he had said I discovered just how effective the stare at an errant student was. No words needed to be exchanged the stare was enough to say “you have been rumbled desist from the wrong you are doing”.
Then in one school as I was tasked to teach religious knowledge to groups of young ladies at an all girls Roman Catholic school. I required a lot of assistance from the head of religion. He was extremely kind and taught me a phrase which said the lord would always keep you clothed or fed. A phrase which meant something to me, as I was often in need but something always turned up. He also pointed out the distinction between us and animals, was we are granted the power of choice. In teaching all faiths it becomes apparent that all religions believe in one creator mostly linked to light and strongly related to my burgeoning theory.
As a teacher of hard fixed things like science and mathematics and computers, it was a very challenging experience. I learnt a lot from that spell. The biggest challenge was where did evolution fit when people can make choices, they mainly chose creation in the past, if you were religious. Science and mathematics do not sit well with creation. Science points to evolution, mathematics to me pointed to creation. Statistics suggest the chances evolution is the best answer does not stack up. The JW’s gave me a magazine which pointed out a jumbo jet composes sand, germanium, steel, aluminium etc. Piled high in their original states how many millions of years would it take to evolve from piles of old dust to a jumbo jet without input from man. The other point about evolution is surely by now if there was anything out there we would have had contact.
In one lesson I contrasted how the population explosion only really happened after the birth of Christ. This confirmed in my opinion that evolution was only after we were created, so both exist in series and in parallel. The whole idea of series feels like a binary world. Parallel suggests arriving at a point from different directions, when tracked back it will always lead to a binary world, one thing following on from another. A big bang then lots of different routes from that bang. The whole idea of black holes seems to suggest once all the matter a hole can contain is full it probably explodes sending light etc out in all directions. A bit like a when a vacuum bag of clothes is opened. It expands to its new limits. The bag still stops you from seeing what was inside but now it has escaped up to some new limiting factor.
So logic suggests, no matter where we look there has to be an explanation. This is where my piecing it all together was helped by my education as a computer programmer. I began to think of how much memory do we have. If a film we watch consists of vision and audio ergo video. We think mostly in terms of light and sound or should it be sound and light, what a juxtaposition however we are more than that at least I think we are.
The beginning of Lightomics
As a scholar we learn about atoms. We are told there is a nucleus and it is surrounded by various numbers of electrons. The nucleus is made of various parts and the arrangement of all this determines what part of our life the atom plays. Combination of these particles can become a solid, fluid or gas depending on how many have gathered together. We are also told the distances are vast. The electrons orbit the nucleus in much the same way as the planets go around our sun. We are told the area between these various components is filled with nothing.
You may question why there is nothing between the nucleus and the electrons which circulate it, a vacuum is the usual vague answer. This poses a huge dichotomy, on one hand we are told there is nothing in a vacuum, usually accompanied with “nature abhors a vacuum”. This makes little or no sense to anyone. However to us all other space is filled with light. So perhaps it is not a vacuum, merely different degrees of light.
So what is light, here again lies another dichotomy. On one hand we are told it is an electromagnetic wave with troughs and peaks, it even has a frequency. The frequency of this light can vary giving us all ranges of light. Infra red is a dangerous wave as is x-ray. Other frequencies manifest themselves as the colours of the rainbow. Yet man has harnessed these to great effect, some good some bad.
Then we are told it is a flow of particles. These particles are called photons and can interact with our atoms in a seemingly solid structure. We all feel the warmth of the sun’s rays when it hits our bodies. What is photography but the permanent scarring of a material effected by light. Think of a camera, a pinhole of light interacts with a plate coated in a light sensitive film.
For those who see, we are told that the light travels along the optic nerve to our brains. This is then interpreted into what we understand as vision. What about blind people what do their brains see? Surely the physical side of light has some impact on their eyes. Maybe it is possible to see without the optic nerve processing the light in the same way as what we call a normally sited person.
Where does all this light come from? Most light comes from our sun. Light can be reflected or direct from a source, our main source of direct light is the sun, but what about light from LED’s etc. So all other light not generated must be reflected unless you are looking at the sun. This means except for direct sunlight all we see has been reflected.
Again man has adapted this reflection and fibre optic cables do just that. These cables can control the movement of light. When they are mixed with electromagnetic waves they can carry data. The type and amount of this data can be varied. Data is a stream of information organised in simple yes no or on off (binary)form. The type of data can be anything that can be converted into this binary format.
Where does this data come from? Most of it is from computers and cameras. Binary data as this on off information is called is the simplest form of this data. This data can even be transmitted in the very air we breathe. This form of wireless data is the bedrock of our mobile phone world. The transporting of this data has become faster and increases in volume as time has gone by.
The main type of data in our mobile phone system is video. This is our sights and sounds converted into streams of data. We are all aware of the moving picture frequency. Pictures shown at speeds over 25 frames a second, appear as continuous motion in our brains. The definition of our video can vary considerably. If you watch a low definition video this is probably the definition in your dreams. Add to that the conversion of our voices and you get video.
It follows if a film we watch consists of vision and audio it can convey an entire life or whatever. The next question is how big would such a record be. Depending on the resolution the video, recording at a rate of 320 by 240 pixels, on a digital medium, be it video tape, film or memory stick, it only needs something like 10 megabytes of memory per minute. If you spend 7 hrs asleep you spend 17 times 60 or roughly 1000 minutes daily. This means in a day you could video your life and only need 10 gigabytes of memory. In a year this is 365 times that or 3.5 terrabytes. In an average lifetime it would be 70 times that about 222 Terrabytes.
Now when you look at capacity of fibre optic cables a 22 core cable is capable of 2150 Terrabytes in a second. Bearing in mind the entire internet is thought to be 4000 exabytes or 1024 times 1024 Terrabyte. This makes you wonder if that is the amount of information in a refined beam of light just how much information can a light beam from the sun contain. Thus more than the entire internet could be contained in a one second burst of light from a source like the sun.
The speed of light is 3 *8 to the power of 10 metres per second. The size of an atom is 10 to the power of minus 10. In other words light travels through an atom in 1 times 10 to -16 of a second. To put this another way the straight distance of light passing through an atom is approximately the amount of light I used in my measure of the size of the internet etc. Put another way light will travel through 3*10 to the power of 18 atoms in one second. Ergo each atom contains the reciprocal of that. An exabyte is 1k * 10 to the power of 18. Again working on the adage there is no such thing as a vacuum and others like “nature abhors a vacuum” a reasonable conclusion is the space between atoms is filled with light energy. So the question then becomes how much can the atom contain. The mathematics may not be precise but the logic seems to be reasonable.
There is a further piece of technological advance know as OSL or optically stimulated luminescence. Here the light held within grains of minerals is subjected to infrared and this allows scientists to estimate when these grains last saw the light of day.
This demonstrates that it can only be a matter of time before we can capture and analyse that very same light to see what it can reveal What is the memory of the light where it is permanently trapped in any material. The biggest worry is that if once released is that then lost or merely transferred.
We clearly have the power and technology to reveal this from the light from the past, we have the technology to piggy back data onto controlled laser light and use that light’s power and speed to transmit information in the present, so logically we will one day be able to read the light from the past to determine what it can reveal. Who knows where this will take us. Forensic examination of the past could be a dangerous but powerful tool. Furthermore the very light held within an atom may be able to be shared to those surrounding it. Thus an entire life may be able to generate or even replicate itself atom by atom.
Interpreting all this.
So having established this all we need is the ability to interpret the light we see. My first reaction is we already do to a lesser extent. I think we piggy back our thoughts onto light reflected or modified through our eyes and brains. This we then mix with other information to retransmit to the eyes of others. I hold my experience as a teacher as anecdotal evidence we can all share. Currently we are working our way towards the control of nerves and their signals to muscles in the body. This is where disabled people with spinal chord injuries are being helped now with implants to drive the muscles in the lower body. This, perhaps with the aid of AI, will lead to the discovery of what makes us really tick.
In addition also reflect on how we experience the feeling of others when we are not present. I recall how I felt my sister’s presence as she was dying, how people who visit the scenes of terrible crimes such as the camps at Aushwitz and similar mass occurrences have etched their very essence into the surroundings. Birds and other animals can sense something terrible happened there. Clearly if the first idea is true then there is a connection.
Looking at OSL it is clear light is absorbed by everything, be it an object, rock whatever perhaps every atom. It may be stored in the space inside the atoms everything is made of. This can last inside for eternity. Therefore any light reflected off anything can have information piggy backed onto it in the way already explained.
If that is the case then it follows that an entire life is less than a one second burst from light. DNA is full of atoms, which in turn are full of light. It therefore follows that everything is connected to everything. So you have within you the complete life of your antecedents. That is basing it on a one second burst, we do not know how many seconds of light are within any atom.
Think too of decay, we shed skin every day of our lives. The very atoms of that can travel onto the land get washed into the seas and back onto the land through fish, seaweed as fertiliser etc. Thus we are consuming and drinking ourselves and others daily. Remember “this is my body, this is my blood”….. This always puzzled me as a young doubting Thomas. Now using all the logic of what I have revealed it all makes sense.
One can of course go further and think of human reproduction. I leave this to your imagination save to say the whole world could be generated by a man, some have even tried. Harems, mass rapes etc just a few examples of man’s willingness to copy himself and inability to control his actions. It is the questions about this which have led me to conclude that now is the time to write this down. My own life experiences have led me to conclude that since a life is the meeting of two sets of chromosomes, then clearly if one set is missing there is no life. Since the male half is generated more frequently than the female, the responsibility lays at the door of man. If abstinence on behalf of man lasted a mere 40 years clearly there would be no human under 40. The world would end in another 80 years since nobody is over 120 years old.
The reason for not writing this earlier has been the reluctance to pass on my thoughts. The modern society we live in could cause untold problems for those nearest and dearest to me. However seeing programs like the 2025 series of BBC’s pilgrimage revealed to me that we should all be questioning why we are here, right up to the end of our existence. We also have a version of what it is that we are comfortable with. When you read this you will have a version of it in your head that is your version. It will be valid for you, hopefully I may have helped some people see a plausible explanation to the very existence of us all. After all we should all be searching for something.
Hopefully this theory of lightomics give us a chance to realise what all pilgrims have found, that there is a higher order than us. It surrounds us all and is within us all. It can remain with us all too. The times when you get older you can see your departed loved ones in your minds eye. We never die just move into a different form, The light that surrounds us and is within us, the objects surrounding us, the water we drink the food we eat, it contains the very light which can move at a million times faster than sound.
Remember the film flight of the navigator and how there were unused areas of the brain these were filled with charts of the universe by some alien life force. Clearly to write this somebody has already been thinking on these lines. The connections to similar lines of thought are evidenced in many areas. Star Trek is another great provider of evidence of similar thoughts. The movement of objects from a place on the ship to a planet or wherever became known as beaming. The strange buzzing sound, which turned out to be a super fast life form which they were unaware of until they could tune into its wavelength. The idea of someone being able to mind melt with any being, a method of reading the being’s thoughts and experiences. A holo deck where one could experience what in effect was a dream world, where reality meets fiction, mostly without detrimental physical effect. All of these things and many more can be explained with the light transfer theory I espouse.
In our brains we often think at two speeds. We hear our voices telling us what to say, but even before that we are reminded and guided by a faster means of communication. In the past people have referred to this as the subconscious. This I believe to be light speed. These thoughts have in the past been considered to be our subconscious thoughts. In reality this is like a two speed process, speed of sound and speed of light. Light and sound together are known as video.
When we dream we rarely remember touch taste or smell. However most people find a large disconnect with reality in our dreams. The storage of important things is a complex and frequently studied subject. The general consensus is dreams are when your brain is deciding how to be able to recall things you consider important. This sorting of information must happen at the speed of light. As we now realise this can be a million times faster than sound. If a picture paints a thousand words then how can you record all of the dreams you have.
This faster level is the most interesting. I feel the speed of light helps explain it. Any thoughts travelling at that speed are clearly capable of contemplating the whole world as we know it in one second. This could explain why our dreams can feel so filled of the whole world. They probably are proving thinking is the best way to travel! Furthermore your dreams are basically a video of life. I have analysed my dreams and can explain all but the lack of senses like smell, touch, taste. Maybe this reinforces my comparison with video. What is video, sound and light combined. What do we transmit over the internet, sound and vide using fibre optics or light transfer.
It goes further than that the more you look at the possibilities of the speed of light the more it explains so much. If an atom can release its light there will be those who can read that information. This transfer of light was used on me with my brain reading in my early years. These light pulses are also measurable as a magnetic wave. You may liken it to a sixth sense. Just like a dog has an enhanced sense of smell, there are people who can pick up an object and feel or maybe sense or maybe even see the previous owners or some fraction of their past.
The movement of light through the brain provides us with an explanation for how memory is retained and refined. Sparks fly when the nerves are transferring light to different parts of the brain. In daylight hours the source of the light is the sun. In darkness the rapid movement of the eyes under the eyelids would provide light generation by friction. This could explain REM sleep. This when analysed is only 10% of your sleep, but due to the speed of light this is ample time to sort out where you store your memories. Dreams are this sorting process plus whatever your mind fancies. Many dream interpreters can pinpoint certain parts of your dreams to events in your past. Sometimes on analysis of my own dreams I can see such roots. They appear to be the brain deciding where to store certain information, short, medium or long term memory.
This friction if it generates light going to the brain it must also propagate it an all directions. This means a persons’ innermost thoughts travel outwards too. When you look at a person you are seeing what they are thinking. We can sometimes imagine it as a personal aura. This can be interpreted by a lot of people and you may have felt it too. This is probably the speed of the light waves causing fluctuations in the colour ranges people can sense. If you half close your eyes a similar effect can be generated by the filtering of light through your eyelashes. This same filtering effect is very useful when confronted with a bright light. Some examples I have found it useful for are when driving and the sun is low in the sky, or when at night a cars headlights coming towards you seem too strong.
Remember light acts in these two ways, as a wave of electromagnetism and as a physical movement of photons. These photons are even smaller than atoms. They are a physical part of light and are responsible for much of the damage cause by intense variations of light. For example ultraviolet rays can be harmful to your skin. Xrays and higher frequencies beyond also cause damage to us as humans.
Sometimes just meeting someone enables you to have that special feeling of ease and of course the opposite. How often have people taken an instant like or dislike to somebody on first sight. The electromagnetic aspect manifest itself as a colour or colours of light. The physical aspect of this emitted light maybe best summarised as a physical bombardment of photons. Think of the expression looking daggers. This is something that is not felt when you are out of site of the person. Remember photons cannot travel far and are easily absorbed. The transmission of light cannot compensate for the physical activity. For example imagine watching a film in sound only, you could not see the anger in people’s eyes. If you see the anger you cannot get a feeling of how intense it is. If they are there in your presence then you can almost feel it.
When we blink we probably have the same effect. Thus light we see is constantly changing and being modified. Just like in the film “Bruce Almighty” when he is hit by a drawer full of peoples problems and flung across an enormous room, the volume of information would be too much for us to take in as we are at the moment. The information in the light in the sky would overwhelm us. We may develop the necessary skills to understand the size of the problem in the future but for now few of us could interpret the light in this way.
Take the first Star Wars film when Obi one feels the force of the planet being destroyed. I had a similar experience, as have many others had similar, when my sister was dying I could not stop thinking of her and talking about her life to those who I sat with.
The list of these instances is countless and maybe even endless. There are those times when you look into the eyes of another creature, be it a dog, cat or another human and feel you are looking into their soul. You probably are looking deep within that being and sometimes you can feel that presence which helps you understand them better. You get from this expressions like a dog mirrors its owner. This may be because they are more able to read the light messages piggy backed onto the light emitted from those owners.
Some dogs can detect illness in their owners such as cancers, stomach ailments and the like. Again an explanation could be the tiny air particles leaving the mouth of a being contain atoms. Those atoms have been inside that being and the light they contain will have interacted with them. Thus if the receiver of those lights can interpret them then the rest is self evident.
Interpreting the religious links
So back to religion and the dilemma creation versus evolution. If we had evolved without being what was created then we would see evidence of changes in repetition of the shortest lives. Remember what I said about the jumbo jet, indeed anything we know of. This doesn’t mean the whole world is binary. We are not magnetic ink on a computer tape or memory.
This is what the law of averages suggests. So why then do we not see it. This could be because the bible suggests we were created and that the creator sent his son to us presumably to correct what we were doing wrong. A set of rules called the ten commandments were allegedly given to one man. These rules have been the bedrock of most religions.
The most effective one of his rules was thou shalt not kill. To my mind it is a closer adherence to this rule from Jesus’s time that has contributed to the population explosion of the modern times. This becomes apparent for me when you plot population growth against time. However this does not condone death as a means of culling the population.
Another rule was honouring your creators. As I have pointed out your DNA is the whole of your past. How far in the past is open to interpretation. The enforcement of marriages into the same “family” is a practice which has produced some very strong bloodlines, but also passed on genetic weaknesses such as haemophilia etc. This elitism has been sought over our history as a panacea, clearly it is not. You are the product of your ancestors. If you watch “Who do you think you are” it becomes more apparent than ever that we do follow both of our parents traits. Usually the males follow the males in most of their physical looks. In my own family after I did my course on nuclear submarines I became aware of this genetic link.
Realising I slept on my stomach on the left side of the bed coupled with my very strong mental links to my mother’s train of thoughts, I conclude she too might sleep in a similar fashion. She was very angry with me when I suggested this to her. “Have you been watching me sleep” she said probably thinking it was some bad thing. I found a photo of my eldest uncle and the striking resemblance was obvious. My great grandfather left his family in Weymouth for London, my mother left hers for Plymouth, I have now left mine for the North and now one of my sons has deserted his brother and me. Similar “coincidences” frequently pop up in the past histories of many of the participants in the show.
So in summary
The commandments also suggest the creator is a very jealous being who wants you to respect and pay homage to him only. This is the most difficult one to explain away with my theory. However if you think of the time in which those rules were set, there were lots of other believed to be gods. Most we now dismiss but all had their good points and bad points. Nearly all religions agree that the light is the most significant constant in our lives next to water.
The other rules that cannot easily be linked to my light theory are more ethical choices for civil order. Adultery, theft, lying and envy. These are all evidence of the majority thinking on creation rather than evolution. Chopping hands off to stop theft maybe a brutal deterrent but is clearly not the answer. If we only evolved then the examples we see in the animal kingdom would dispel all of these. There are few animals which are truly monogamous so they are not tied to one another. There are plenty of animals who steal food from one another even their homes or hideaways as well as partners. These are all based on envy and the need to recreate images of themselves. As for worshipping on a set day this too is surely a creation only rule.
The mutilation of bodies is barbaric, if god does exist where in the world do practices such as FGM, Circumcision at birth, killing people in an eye for an eye fashion, decorating bodies and piercing etc, fit in. They are outdated actions organized to give artificial power to the perpetrators and more often than not, remove freedom of choice of the individuals.
The same is true of wealth, for the lucky few, good news, for the rest tough luck and the retention of such wealth is almost anti social in itself. Remember the turning over of the tables by Jesus. Clearly the rich have an awful burden to bear, responsible for much unfairness in the world. Jesus was sent to correct all these things to help correct what was unjust or wrong at the time.
So in summary there is really only need for a few rules to have a polite equitable life.
Do not kill.
Treat everyone as equals
Treat everyone as you would expect to be treated.
Respect people, property and animals
Be honest, trustworthy and loyal
Adherence to not kill would mean an end to wars. Leaders may order people to war but individuals do the killing.
If you treat everyone as equals once two people have agreed to share their lives then the statement let no man put asunder shows that all should respect the wishes of those committed to each other.
If everyone is respectful to others and respects their property there would be no theft. There would be no cruelty to animals.
To be honest one should never lie. If you say you are going to do something then others should be able trust you will be as good as your word.
If you treat everyone as equals then you can be loyal to your friends and others you choose to share your life with.
However should anyone transgress any rules they will be unable to complain if the world treats them as they have treated those they have transgressed.
The writing of this has taken years of thought but less than an hour to read. By the nature of my reading difficulties you may have been quicker. To improve the world we need a mass moment together, my proposal is for us all to have a special date and time. Perhaps midnight gmt on 31st December we should all think of the world we wish to have, a future garden of Eden, without war or conflict where people follow just those few simple rules.
In true university style there are those before me whose contributions formed the thoughts and words written here. If you find any comfort in this writing please pass it on freely to anyone of like mind. Maybe the light will shine on those who need it. Oh the answer to that awkward question “why” perhaps it is “why not”. After all it is a binary world is it not…….internal://7d72a363-566b-41dd-a9a5-582ef01de8fa/a
Lightomics a new word combining Light and atomics
The essence of this theory
The marriage of a series of questions asked by the writer with a common link.
The theory has been researched with the help of AI and google searching, connecting film and television series to a far reaching plausible piece of logic.
©Copyright. All rights reserved.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.